lohud.com

Sponsored by:

The LoHud Mets Blog

All about the Mets

Wilpon: Mets not for sale

December
17

Jeff Wilpon shot down any notion that the Mets were for sale in light of recent news that his father’s business, Sterling Equities, lost several hundred million dollars. They were scammed by Bernard Madoff, a 70-year-old investor that, according to the story, may’ve stolen $50 billion total.

Here’s the story than ran on ESPN from the AP. If you don’t have time to read it all, basically it includes the younger Wilpon saying the Mets, SNY and Citi Field will not be affected.

And the notion that the Mets are for sale? Forget it.

(The team is) uncategorically, totally, completely not for sale. … Not a piece of it, not a part of it, none of it.

Everyone will believe them if the Mets continue to act aggressively this offseason. If not, fans may at least raise the question. After all, they are moving into a new stadium and prices aren’t exactly going to go down.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 17th, 2008 at 11:19 pm by Josh Thomson.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Print This Post Print This Post | Email

Advertisement

2 Responses to “Wilpon: Mets not for sale”

  1. ???

    ??????? ??? ????????? ?? DRUGREVENUE ? ???????? ?????? ? 3000 ????????, ???????

  2. METSFAN

    Too bad they didn’t lose all their money.

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About this blog
A team of writers from The Journal News share their thoughts on the Mets with the Lower Hudson fans.

Subscribe
LoHud Mets Podcast | Get iTunes

Daily Email Newsletter:



Mets Poll
Players are announcing their free agency. Which one would you like to see the Mets pick up?
View Results





Other recent entries

MLB SALARY DATABASE
Links


Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives


Bad Behavior has blocked 1854 access attempts in the last 7 days.