<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mets Chat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/</link>
	<description>All about the Mets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:08:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Man</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37110</link>
		<dc:creator>The Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37110</guid>
		<description>&quot;I thought myself that the radar gun wasnâ€™t accurate because Santanaâ€™s fastball was 88-89, never breaking 90 but than Sanchezâ€™s was 90-91. I thought Santana threw in the mid 90â€™s.&quot;

Actually Santana was 89-90, and when he had 2 strikes on a hitter he would hit 92 on the black. He only hit 88 once, and it may have been to throw off the timing of the hitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I thought myself that the radar gun wasnâ€™t accurate because Santanaâ€™s fastball was 88-89, never breaking 90 but than Sanchezâ€™s was 90-91. I thought Santana threw in the mid 90â€™s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually Santana was 89-90, and when he had 2 strikes on a hitter he would hit 92 on the black. He only hit 88 once, and it may have been to throw off the timing of the hitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clm</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37103</link>
		<dc:creator>clm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37103</guid>
		<description>Heard Eddie Coleman on the fan say the Santana&#039;s velocity is improving in each start. Not so sure that they really let it out in spring training until the end. Not so sure that they don&#039;t either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard Eddie Coleman on the fan say the Santana&#8217;s velocity is improving in each start. Not so sure that they really let it out in spring training until the end. Not so sure that they don&#8217;t either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomg</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37098</link>
		<dc:creator>tomg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37098</guid>
		<description>I thought myself that the radar gun wasn&#039;t accurate because Santana&#039;s fastball was 88-89, never breaking 90 but than Sanchez&#039;s was 90-91. I thought Santana threw in the mid 90&#039;s.
I wonder if Santana is losing his velocity like pedro did around the same age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought myself that the radar gun wasn&#8217;t accurate because Santana&#8217;s fastball was 88-89, never breaking 90 but than Sanchez&#8217;s was 90-91. I thought Santana threw in the mid 90&#8217;s.<br />
I wonder if Santana is losing his velocity like pedro did around the same age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37097</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37097</guid>
		<description>How bout ElDuqe. Anybody want to take a crack at the runs scored against him for Sunday?

I asked the question about Santana&#039;s velocity. He was around 91 most of the time. 

JDelcos, any whisper about this? He has not hit 93-95 this spring. Is he just takin it easy or has he lost some as was reported late last yr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How bout ElDuqe. Anybody want to take a crack at the runs scored against him for Sunday?</p>
<p>I asked the question about Santana&#8217;s velocity. He was around 91 most of the time. </p>
<p>JDelcos, any whisper about this? He has not hit 93-95 this spring. Is he just takin it easy or has he lost some as was reported late last yr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37095</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37095</guid>
		<description>John,

How was Santana&#039;s velocity last night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>How was Santana&#8217;s velocity last night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37094</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37094</guid>
		<description>metsfan,  I request that since you don&#039;t believe in the integrity of the hostr, that you go elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>metsfan,  I request that since you don&#8217;t believe in the integrity of the hostr, that you go elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37092</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37092</guid>
		<description>It seems that they really like Register and leaving Snachez down to increase his arm str gives them a chance to keep him. 

What happens to Register once Sanchez is ready; we will have to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that they really like Register and leaving Snachez down to increase his arm str gives them a chance to keep him. </p>
<p>What happens to Register once Sanchez is ready; we will have to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37087</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/20/mets-chat-7/#comment-37087</guid>
		<description>Beltran had some really nice swings today.  Thought that was worth mentioning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beltran had some really nice swings today.  Thought that was worth mentioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
