<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mets Chat: Good signs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/</link>
	<description>All about the Mets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:08:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36031</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36031</guid>
		<description>slop, maybe others think 29 yrs old is a prospect but I have not said that nor would I ever say that. And I never stated that he is the sun, the moon and the stars, or even the sun, or the moon or the stars or even a star. 

He is a decent player that will provide .275/18/70/.360/40db in 500 AB. For 6th or 7th in the order, alot of teams would take that. Mets will take it too. 

He is not a 6th place hitter for a team that scores 950 runs. But Mets don&#039;t have to score 950. 850 would have sufficed last yr to make the playoffs. 850 will suffice this yr if the pitching is improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slop, maybe others think 29 yrs old is a prospect but I have not said that nor would I ever say that. And I never stated that he is the sun, the moon and the stars, or even the sun, or the moon or the stars or even a star. </p>
<p>He is a decent player that will provide .275/18/70/.360/40db in 500 AB. For 6th or 7th in the order, alot of teams would take that. Mets will take it too. </p>
<p>He is not a 6th place hitter for a team that scores 950 runs. But Mets don&#8217;t have to score 950. 850 would have sufficed last yr to make the playoffs. 850 will suffice this yr if the pitching is improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36017</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36017</guid>
		<description>Mike C., I guess my point is I don&#039;t think that&#039;s really quantifiable, at least without going crazy in depth.  I do think that Beltran simply gets to balls that other CFs wouldn&#039;t.  It would look like a clean base hit with a different guy out there, with Beltran instead its a clean out.  The crazy athletic circus plays only happen occasionally, but that&#039;s not all there is to defense.  

It is true that the majority of defensive plays are either &quot;makable&quot; or not.  But I don&#039;t think its as overwhelming as you make it out to be, and the plays that do make the difference  between a &quot;great&quot; defensive player and a &quot;good&quot; one aren&#039;t the ones you see on ESPN&#039;s web gems.  They are the ones who execute fundamental baseball day in and day out and don&#039;t make mistakes.  There are plenty of times in a season where a defensive play can be the deciding factor in a given game, whether it be a good play or a poor play.  I definitely feel that having a quality defense as opposed to an average defense is worth a handful of wins at the end of the season.  Does having 8 gold glovers have the same impact as five ace pitchers?  Probably not, but I still feel its a very important part of the game that&#039;s just difficult to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike C., I guess my point is I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s really quantifiable, at least without going crazy in depth.  I do think that Beltran simply gets to balls that other CFs wouldn&#8217;t.  It would look like a clean base hit with a different guy out there, with Beltran instead its a clean out.  The crazy athletic circus plays only happen occasionally, but that&#8217;s not all there is to defense.  </p>
<p>It is true that the majority of defensive plays are either &#8220;makable&#8221; or not.  But I don&#8217;t think its as overwhelming as you make it out to be, and the plays that do make the difference  between a &#8220;great&#8221; defensive player and a &#8220;good&#8221; one aren&#8217;t the ones you see on ESPN&#8217;s web gems.  They are the ones who execute fundamental baseball day in and day out and don&#8217;t make mistakes.  There are plenty of times in a season where a defensive play can be the deciding factor in a given game, whether it be a good play or a poor play.  I definitely feel that having a quality defense as opposed to an average defense is worth a handful of wins at the end of the season.  Does having 8 gold glovers have the same impact as five ace pitchers?  Probably not, but I still feel its a very important part of the game that&#8217;s just difficult to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36015</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36015</guid>
		<description>If Church has a similar number of doubles as last year we are ok. You don&#039;t have to hit HR&#039;s to be productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Church has a similar number of doubles as last year we are ok. You don&#8217;t have to hit HR&#8217;s to be productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36012</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36012</guid>
		<description>why is it that anyone who says church is not the sun the moon and the stars is rooting against him????  maybe all the delgado bashers last years wanted him to fail,  i however, want church to succeed,  i just don&#039;t make up fantasies in my mind to make him something he has yet to be, and is much too old to be a prospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it that anyone who says church is not the sun the moon and the stars is rooting against him????  maybe all the delgado bashers last years wanted him to fail,  i however, want church to succeed,  i just don&#8217;t make up fantasies in my mind to make him something he has yet to be, and is much too old to be a prospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36011</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36011</guid>
		<description>I am ambivalent about the Church trade. But he is here so I hope he does well. You can continue to root against him and point out his failures w/o pointing out his successes but it won&#039;t do any good b/c there is no one to replace him. 

He had almost 500 AB last yr. To me, he has already proven he can play everyday whether it is 6th or 7th. 6th is more of an RBI spot but he isn&#039;t being asked to bat cleanup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am ambivalent about the Church trade. But he is here so I hope he does well. You can continue to root against him and point out his failures w/o pointing out his successes but it won&#8217;t do any good b/c there is no one to replace him. </p>
<p>He had almost 500 AB last yr. To me, he has already proven he can play everyday whether it is 6th or 7th. 6th is more of an RBI spot but he isn&#8217;t being asked to bat cleanup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36010</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36010</guid>
		<description>Just because you like Church doesn&#039;t mean he will hit better then Green.  Green was asked to bat 7th just like Church was, but Church is going to have to bat 6th now. And he is being asked to do more now since the Mets have taken this career platoon player and made him an everyday player. 

As for Delgado&#039;s hip that the stick mentions, it doesn&#039;t bother me either.  my hip doesn&#039;t hurt a bit......However, I wouldn&#039;t want to be swinging a bat with a pain in my hip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you like Church doesn&#8217;t mean he will hit better then Green.  Green was asked to bat 7th just like Church was, but Church is going to have to bat 6th now. And he is being asked to do more now since the Mets have taken this career platoon player and made him an everyday player. </p>
<p>As for Delgado&#8217;s hip that the stick mentions, it doesn&#8217;t bother me either.  my hip doesn&#8217;t hurt a bit&#8230;...However, I wouldn&#8217;t want to be swinging a bat with a pain in my hip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-36004</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-36004</guid>
		<description>Chances of all these guys regressing all in the same yr is possible but not probable.

Ok you got me on Alou. No, I don&#039;t believe he hits .340, but .300 yes. Alou has always hit when he plays. Unless you think he is going to play 30 games instead of 80, the production should be same as last yr from LF. Just b/c you don&#039;t like the signing does not mean he won&#039;t hit.

Delgado&#039;s hip? Time will tell. But he did play last yr w/several injuries, including a hip. I don&#039;t see why he can&#039;t do 20/75.

Beltran and Castillo played on bad knees last yr. Beltran won a SS. Castillo did alright. Unless the surgeries went wrong, I don&#039;t see how they perform worse.

Just b/c you don&#039;t like Church deal does not mean he will play poorly. He is hitting 7th in the order. He is not being asked to do more than in the past so I don&#039;t see how playing in NY effects him.

Agree w/stick. Scheinder/Castro is as good as LoDuca.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chances of all these guys regressing all in the same yr is possible but not probable.</p>
<p>Ok you got me on Alou. No, I don&#8217;t believe he hits .340, but .300 yes. Alou has always hit when he plays. Unless you think he is going to play 30 games instead of 80, the production should be same as last yr from LF. Just b/c you don&#8217;t like the signing does not mean he won&#8217;t hit.</p>
<p>Delgado&#8217;s hip? Time will tell. But he did play last yr w/several injuries, including a hip. I don&#8217;t see why he can&#8217;t do 20/75.</p>
<p>Beltran and Castillo played on bad knees last yr. Beltran won a SS. Castillo did alright. Unless the surgeries went wrong, I don&#8217;t see how they perform worse.</p>
<p>Just b/c you don&#8217;t like Church deal does not mean he will play poorly. He is hitting 7th in the order. He is not being asked to do more than in the past so I don&#8217;t see how playing in NY effects him.</p>
<p>Agree w/stick. Scheinder/Castro is as good as LoDuca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stick</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35986</link>
		<dc:creator>stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35986</guid>
		<description>Sloppy, Alou might not hit .340 again, but he should still be productive when he is on the field.

Delgado&#039;s hip doesn&#039;t actually bother me that much.  Most likely, if it had been during the season, he would have had treatment and just played through it.  At this point, they know what it is, and will do regular maintenance on it (drugs, treatment, etc.).

If that is the worst physical ailment he has this year, we are in good shape!

And Schneider will be just as productive as Loduca was last year (hard not to be, since Paulie stunk with the bat).  Also, keep in mind that Schneiders numbers were dragged down by playing against lefties, and with Castro, he should get more rest against the tougher ones.

And since Castro will play more this year than last (at least that  is the plan), the overall numbers from the catchers spot should be better.

RF, with Church, should also be overall better, and more stable, and certainly the D should improve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppy, Alou might not hit .340 again, but he should still be productive when he is on the field.</p>
<p>Delgado&#8217;s hip doesn&#8217;t actually bother me that much.  Most likely, if it had been during the season, he would have had treatment and just played through it.  At this point, they know what it is, and will do regular maintenance on it (drugs, treatment, etc.).</p>
<p>If that is the worst physical ailment he has this year, we are in good shape!</p>
<p>And Schneider will be just as productive as Loduca was last year (hard not to be, since Paulie stunk with the bat).  Also, keep in mind that Schneiders numbers were dragged down by playing against lefties, and with Castro, he should get more rest against the tougher ones.</p>
<p>And since Castro will play more this year than last (at least that  is the plan), the overall numbers from the catchers spot should be better.</p>
<p>RF, with Church, should also be overall better, and more stable, and certainly the D should improve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35965</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35965</guid>
		<description>To answer your question scoop:

Alou?  You think a guy who will be 42 is going to hit over 340 again, especially since he has injuries already, coming off surgery.  He definitely regresses.
Delgado:  This is a big question.  If his hip bothers him a lot he will miss enough games to continue to regress.  If his hip feels ok then its a question of one bad year or rapid aging.
Church  worse than Green?  We&#039;ll see.  You never can guarantee a player&#039;s reaction to NY.  He might thrive or be a disaster.
Schneider vs LoDuca...  Yes the offense is worse.  But what is worse his prsence in the 8 th spot makes it very hard for Randolph to fit Alou&#039;s subs into the lineup where they can help.  
Reyes:  If he doesn&#039;t bounce bacvk this team is in big trouble.
Beltran&gt;  wouldn&#039;t youy like to know if the knees really hurt or not.
Castillo:  See Beltran.....   

Robert:  If we need to bring up the guys you are watching then this team is finioshed.  None of them are big league ready....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question scoop:</p>
<p>Alou?  You think a guy who will be 42 is going to hit over 340 again, especially since he has injuries already, coming off surgery.  He definitely regresses.<br />
Delgado:  This is a big question.  If his hip bothers him a lot he will miss enough games to continue to regress.  If his hip feels ok then its a question of one bad year or rapid aging.<br />
Church  worse than Green?  We&#8217;ll see.  You never can guarantee a player&#8217;s reaction to NY.  He might thrive or be a disaster.<br />
Schneider vs LoDuca&#8230;  Yes the offense is worse.  But what is worse his prsence in the 8 th spot makes it very hard for Randolph to fit Alou&#8217;s subs into the lineup where they can help.  <br />
Reyes:  If he doesn&#8217;t bounce bacvk this team is in big trouble.<br />
Beltran>  wouldn&#8217;t youy like to know if the knees really hurt or not.<br />
Castillo:  See Beltran&#8230;..   </p>
<p>Robert:  If we need to bring up the guys you are watching then this team is finioshed.  None of them are big league ready&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35964</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35964</guid>
		<description>It is great the young players are getting a shot.  We know what the vets can do.  The need will arise during the season to bring some of these kids up.
www.recreateyourlifenow.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great the young players are getting a shot.  We know what the vets can do.  The need will arise during the season to bring some of these kids up.<br />
<a href="http://www.recreateyourlifenow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.recreateyourlifenow.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35963</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35963</guid>
		<description>Offensive regression? 

Who is going to regress?

Delgado less than 24HR/87?

Alou?

Reyes less than .280/12/57?

Is Church/Scheinder worse than Green/LoDuca?

The teams offense finished 4th in runs scored last yr. Unless Alou and Delgado play 50 games ea, I don&#039;t see the regression. I see an increase in runs scored from a better Reyes, a similar Delgado and Alou, a better RF and more out of 2B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offensive regression? </p>
<p>Who is going to regress?</p>
<p>Delgado less than 24HR/87?</p>
<p>Alou?</p>
<p>Reyes less than .280/12/57?</p>
<p>Is Church/Scheinder worse than Green/LoDuca?</p>
<p>The teams offense finished 4th in runs scored last yr. Unless Alou and Delgado play 50 games ea, I don&#8217;t see the regression. I see an increase in runs scored from a better Reyes, a similar Delgado and Alou, a better RF and more out of 2B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C.</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35954</guid>
		<description>I guess what I mean is... most of the make-able defensive plays are going to be in any good defensive player&#039;s range at that position, there&#039;s only going to be very occasional plays that a great player will get that a good player wouldn&#039;t.

Jeter, I mean, there&#039;s an over-rated defender if I&#039;ve ever seen one in my entire life. 

He simply doesn&#039;t have a shortstop&#039;s range and so plays that would be routine for any other shortstop he has to make LOOK hard with the dive and the throw.

How often is that ball going to get hit that Average Centre-Fielder can&#039;t get to but Beltran or Hunter or whoever can?

Once a week? Once a month? Ten times a season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what I mean is&#8230; most of the make-able defensive plays are going to be in any good defensive player&#8217;s range at that position, there&#8217;s only going to be very occasional plays that a great player will get that a good player wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Jeter, I mean, there&#8217;s an over-rated defender if I&#8217;ve ever seen one in my entire life. </p>
<p>He simply doesn&#8217;t have a shortstop&#8217;s range and so plays that would be routine for any other shortstop he has to make LOOK hard with the dive and the throw.</p>
<p>How often is that ball going to get hit that Average Centre-Fielder can&#8217;t get to but Beltran or Hunter or whoever can?</p>
<p>Once a week? Once a month? Ten times a season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35953</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35953</guid>
		<description>I disagree Mike C.  I think its difficult to tell the difference between a &quot;good&quot; and &quot;great&quot; fielding play on TV, but I do think it makes a difference.  I was sold on this point the day Carlos Gomez made his debut last year.  Ollie was pitching, and I was at Shea.  He took a shutout into the 9th, many thanks to some very good outfield defense from Gomez, Beltran, and Chavez.  It wasn&#039;t that they made spectacular circus catches, but they just closed the gaps so much more efficiently than the average outfielder.  And some of the plays they made would have had to be circus catches for an average defender.  But for those three, it just seemed like no matter where a ball was hit, if it had any hangtime at all there was someone that could close the ground on it and make it look easy.  

I think the difference between good and excellent defense is especially hard to see with Beltran.  He looks so effortless when he runs, we take for granted just how much range he has and just how good his jumps are.  This could be said for Reyes to.  The fact that he combines great range, speed, and a cannon arm means he runs balls down that an average SS would have to dive for, and he&#039;s almost always got time to set and throw.  A good contrast for this is Derek Jeter, who frequently throws off balance or moving in the other direction.  Granted Jeter is quite good at that throw, you&#039;d always rather see the guy have time to set himself and make a good strong throw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree Mike C.  I think its difficult to tell the difference between a &#8220;good&#8221; and &#8220;great&#8221; fielding play on TV, but I do think it makes a difference.  I was sold on this point the day Carlos Gomez made his debut last year.  Ollie was pitching, and I was at Shea.  He took a shutout into the 9th, many thanks to some very good outfield defense from Gomez, Beltran, and Chavez.  It wasn&#8217;t that they made spectacular circus catches, but they just closed the gaps so much more efficiently than the average outfielder.  And some of the plays they made would have had to be circus catches for an average defender.  But for those three, it just seemed like no matter where a ball was hit, if it had any hangtime at all there was someone that could close the ground on it and make it look easy.  </p>
<p>I think the difference between good and excellent defense is especially hard to see with Beltran.  He looks so effortless when he runs, we take for granted just how much range he has and just how good his jumps are.  This could be said for Reyes to.  The fact that he combines great range, speed, and a cannon arm means he runs balls down that an average SS would have to dive for, and he&#8217;s almost always got time to set and throw.  A good contrast for this is Derek Jeter, who frequently throws off balance or moving in the other direction.  Granted Jeter is quite good at that throw, you&#8217;d always rather see the guy have time to set himself and make a good strong throw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C.</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35945</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35945</guid>
		<description>The pitching will be great... but will it make up for the offensive regression? I&#039;m not sold.

Also... extraordinary defense is a bit over-rated in baseball insofar as the small number of places where an amazing fielder will actually make a play that a simply good fielder will not.

Most of the time, either a good fielder will make the play or no fielder would be able to make the play.

Delgado&#039;s defense will regress, Castillo and Schneider are not the defensive wizards they used to be and while Church is probably a better fielder than Milledge was at the end of last season, Milledge is going to eventually grow into a better fielder than Church is now.

I&#039;d say that the defensive &quot;upgrades&quot; will be minor at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pitching will be great&#8230; but will it make up for the offensive regression? I&#8217;m not sold.</p>
<p>Also&#8230; extraordinary defense is a bit over-rated in baseball insofar as the small number of places where an amazing fielder will actually make a play that a simply good fielder will not.</p>
<p>Most of the time, either a good fielder will make the play or no fielder would be able to make the play.</p>
<p>Delgado&#8217;s defense will regress, Castillo and Schneider are not the defensive wizards they used to be and while Church is probably a better fielder than Milledge was at the end of last season, Milledge is going to eventually grow into a better fielder than Church is now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that the defensive &#8220;upgrades&#8221; will be minor at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35943</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35943</guid>
		<description>Pitching &amp; D will take you a long way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitching &#038; D will take you a long way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35942</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35942</guid>
		<description>Spring records

07 12-21, 06 16-14, 05 17-11, 04 13-20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spring records</p>
<p>07 12-21, 06 16-14, 05 17-11, 04 13-20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C.</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-35939</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2008/03/09/mets-chat-good-signs/#comment-35939</guid>
		<description>The summation sentence for the Mets now is the same summation sentence for the Mets as existed directly after the Santana acquisition:

&quot;Oh, they can definitely pitch but will the aging and brittle starting line-up stay healthy enough to close the deal for the pitchers?&quot;

Its a question that is a long ways away from an answer, still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The summation sentence for the Mets now is the same summation sentence for the Mets as existed directly after the Santana acquisition:</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, they can definitely pitch but will the aging and brittle starting line-up stay healthy enough to close the deal for the pitchers?&#8221;</p>
<p>Its a question that is a long ways away from an answer, still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
