<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What about Clemens?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/</link>
	<description>All about the Mets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:08:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31121</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31121</guid>
		<description>adl

you miss the point. this is not a court of law. there are no criminal penalties. this is the court of public opinion. they are entertainers who pretend to be pure sportsmen. 

for the short time they were tested they were given the test date ahead of time so they and their enablers can cheat the system. as the participants in track and field know when you know when you are going to take a test and you have well paid chemists at your disposal you can game the system. marion jones did, but the difference is that years later they still have the blood samples ( not urine ). they can test those samples years later with better techniques and prove the cheating that went on before. 

she and others&#039; like her ( the east germans in the soviet era ) could game the system for a while and claim they never cheated. just like bonds.

the problem is the players assoc. will not allow real testing and real penalties to be enforced. they are serving their client which is the cheaters they are trying to protect.

don&#039;t take baseball&#039;s inept management of the situation as proof that no one is cheating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adl</p>
<p>you miss the point. this is not a court of law. there are no criminal penalties. this is the court of public opinion. they are entertainers who pretend to be pure sportsmen. </p>
<p>for the short time they were tested they were given the test date ahead of time so they and their enablers can cheat the system. as the participants in track and field know when you know when you are going to take a test and you have well paid chemists at your disposal you can game the system. marion jones did, but the difference is that years later they still have the blood samples ( not urine ). they can test those samples years later with better techniques and prove the cheating that went on before. </p>
<p>she and others&#8217; like her ( the east germans in the soviet era ) could game the system for a while and claim they never cheated. just like bonds.</p>
<p>the problem is the players assoc. will not allow real testing and real penalties to be enforced. they are serving their client which is the cheaters they are trying to protect.</p>
<p>don&#8217;t take baseball&#8217;s inept management of the situation as proof that no one is cheating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pounder</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31096</link>
		<dc:creator>pounder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31096</guid>
		<description>We all should have been clued in when Clemens threw Gay Mike&#039;s splintered bat back at him.Was this a case of Roid Rage,or just Clemens homophobia ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all should have been clued in when Clemens threw Gay Mike&#8217;s splintered bat back at him.Was this a case of Roid Rage,or just Clemens homophobia ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adl</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31088</link>
		<dc:creator>adl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31088</guid>
		<description>Sure, ban him from baseball and the HoF. No need for real evidence, the Mitchell accusations will do. No need to offer him the opportunity to defend himself because it&#039;s not a criminal trial. Impose some penalties, preserve the &quot;integrity of the game&quot; (whatever that is) and spend meaningful time dispersing all the money from the TV contract. It&#039;s not like due process is required, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, ban him from baseball and the HoF. No need for real evidence, the Mitchell accusations will do. No need to offer him the opportunity to defend himself because it&#8217;s not a criminal trial. Impose some penalties, preserve the &#8220;integrity of the game&#8221; (whatever that is) and spend meaningful time dispersing all the money from the TV contract. It&#8217;s not like due process is required, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31060</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31060</guid>
		<description>I think this is very simple. This is a flawed report. Mitchell had no power to compel anyone to tell the truth. No one cooperated that did not already face jail time.

Players have been taking for far longer than 2000. I think the easy solution is to let stand whatever team records as far as win/losses because you cannot untangle the mess and you cannot go back and replay seasons.

You can punish individuals who cheated. That is a personal decision based on pride and greed. You zero out all their personal records. You do not quibble about when they started , how long they cheated, the relative talent of the individuals. White Shoes Johnson had lots of talent and his career ended and was wiped from baseball. He was also cleared I believe. 

Clemens, Bonds, McGuire, etc should have all personal records rolled back to zero. No accomplishments no debate on HOF. They were made millionaires by cheating. That is their reward. They do not deserve immortality.

If you really want to get serious you go after the clubs. If you can prove that they knew what was going on you penalize them in some way. You also create penalties like the players have to face if they allow cheating to occur. Managers, trainers, owners, GM&#039;s, scouts should all bear some form of penalty from $$ to suspensions or bans or a forced sale of their interest in the clubs. 

Those are real penalties that will force a change in behavior and leave no doubt as to the integrity of the game.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is very simple. This is a flawed report. Mitchell had no power to compel anyone to tell the truth. No one cooperated that did not already face jail time.</p>
<p>Players have been taking for far longer than 2000. I think the easy solution is to let stand whatever team records as far as win/losses because you cannot untangle the mess and you cannot go back and replay seasons.</p>
<p>You can punish individuals who cheated. That is a personal decision based on pride and greed. You zero out all their personal records. You do not quibble about when they started , how long they cheated, the relative talent of the individuals. White Shoes Johnson had lots of talent and his career ended and was wiped from baseball. He was also cleared I believe. </p>
<p>Clemens, Bonds, McGuire, etc should have all personal records rolled back to zero. No accomplishments no debate on HOF. They were made millionaires by cheating. That is their reward. They do not deserve immortality.</p>
<p>If you really want to get serious you go after the clubs. If you can prove that they knew what was going on you penalize them in some way. You also create penalties like the players have to face if they allow cheating to occur. Managers, trainers, owners, GM&#8217;s, scouts should all bear some form of penalty from $$ to suspensions or bans or a forced sale of their interest in the clubs. </p>
<p>Those are real penalties that will force a change in behavior and leave no doubt as to the integrity of the game.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clm</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31050</link>
		<dc:creator>clm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31050</guid>
		<description>Anyone that uses PEDs to perform need not apply to my HOF. They are baned pure and simple. Look at the report and add 20% for those not named and the vast majority of baseball players did not cheat and were unfairly compensated in retrospect.

Clemens, he was great but I never thought he was Steve Carlton, Lou Brock, or, Tom Seaver. I could never figure how he was doing it and couldn&#039;t believe he just kept pulling down the Cy Young Awards. It just makes those that didn&#039;t look so much better for their accomplishments.

As far as 2000? Well, as a Mets fan I can only say -- Can you say Armando Benitez? That&#039;s what killed us, not these cheaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone that uses PEDs to perform need not apply to my HOF. They are baned pure and simple. Look at the report and add 20% for those not named and the vast majority of baseball players did not cheat and were unfairly compensated in retrospect.</p>
<p>Clemens, he was great but I never thought he was Steve Carlton, Lou Brock, or, Tom Seaver. I could never figure how he was doing it and couldn&#8217;t believe he just kept pulling down the Cy Young Awards. It just makes those that didn&#8217;t look so much better for their accomplishments.</p>
<p>As far as 2000? Well, as a Mets fan I can only say&#8212;Can you say Armando Benitez? That&#8217;s what killed us, not these cheaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31042</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31042</guid>
		<description>Thank you Bobby Bones for your entertaining, and very delusional post.  I knew I&#039;d find posts saying VClenmens is a good cheat and Bonds is a bafd cheat.  

Personally, I could care less what any voter does on the HOF ballot as long as each one is consistant with the voting.  If anyone follows, Mr Bones lead, they should be expelled from the voting process,  All these guys will have to vote their own conscience and heart becasue I don&#039;t see MLB giving any guidelines.  So good luck to JD and all the other voters stuck with this dilemma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bobby Bones for your entertaining, and very delusional post.  I knew I&#8217;d find posts saying VClenmens is a good cheat and Bonds is a bafd cheat.  </p>
<p>Personally, I could care less what any voter does on the HOF ballot as long as each one is consistant with the voting.  If anyone follows, Mr Bones lead, they should be expelled from the voting process,  All these guys will have to vote their own conscience and heart becasue I don&#8217;t see MLB giving any guidelines.  So good luck to JD and all the other voters stuck with this dilemma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaver</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31041</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31041</guid>
		<description>No pitcher in the history of the game before Clemens turned around his performance as dramatically as Clemens did.  In other words, there is no historical precedent for the way he pitched after having lost it.  And the numbers don&#039;t lie.  Training/schmaining.  Yes, some people have more natural ability than others, and yes, proper diet and exercise can increase your strength, endurance and longevity, and yes you have the odd freak of nature like Nolan Ryan, but you don&#039;t just turn it around the way Roger did at his age without &quot;assistance&quot;.  I don&#039;t know whether that disqualifies him from HOF or not, but it sure is additional evidence of the use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No pitcher in the history of the game before Clemens turned around his performance as dramatically as Clemens did.  In other words, there is no historical precedent for the way he pitched after having lost it.  And the numbers don&#8217;t lie.  Training/schmaining.  Yes, some people have more natural ability than others, and yes, proper diet and exercise can increase your strength, endurance and longevity, and yes you have the odd freak of nature like Nolan Ryan, but you don&#8217;t just turn it around the way Roger did at his age without &#8220;assistance&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t know whether that disqualifies him from HOF or not, but it sure is additional evidence of the use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31040</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31040</guid>
		<description>xyranx, yes we read the report. Do you really believe that the players&#039; usage of PEDs was restricted to just the documented instances in those pages? Where there&#039;s smoke, there&#039;s fire. 

--First off, Pettitte has been a close training partner of Clemens since he became a Yankee and he&#039;d already been juicing for years. Don&#039;t tell me Clemens didn&#039;t share his little dirty secrets with Pettitte. Apparently Andy wasn&#039;t as dandy as you Yankee fans were led to believe.

--Same with Stanton. So many Yankees were doing PEDs in 2000 that I can&#039;t believe Stanton didn&#039;t do it either, since he was so eager to do HGH shortly thereafter.

--You then fail to mention that Knoblauch hit .275 and .333 in the earlier rounds. Well if you don&#039;t win those games your team doesn&#039;t even make it to the WS. 

--Say for a moment we give Pettitte the benefit of the doubt for 2000, then there&#039;s still Neagle. He and Clemens accounted for 2 Yankee wins in the WS. Now those wins are tainted, throwing into question the whole legitimacy of the Yankees 2000 title. 

Lets face it, that whole Yankee team was tarnished badly by the Mitchell report. Take off your pin-striped blinders long enough to be objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xyranx, yes we read the report. Do you really believe that the players&#8217; usage of PEDs was restricted to just the documented instances in those pages? Where there&#8217;s smoke, there&#8217;s fire. <br />
&#8212;First off, Pettitte has been a close training partner of Clemens since he became a Yankee and he&#8217;d already been juicing for years. Don&#8217;t tell me Clemens didn&#8217;t share his little dirty secrets with Pettitte. Apparently Andy wasn&#8217;t as dandy as you Yankee fans were led to believe.<br />
&#8212;Same with Stanton. So many Yankees were doing PEDs in 2000 that I can&#8217;t believe Stanton didn&#8217;t do it either, since he was so eager to do HGH shortly thereafter.<br />
&#8212;You then fail to mention that Knoblauch hit .275 and .333 in the earlier rounds. Well if you don&#8217;t win those games your team doesn&#8217;t even make it to the WS. <br />
&#8212;Say for a moment we give Pettitte the benefit of the doubt for 2000, then there&#8217;s still Neagle. He and Clemens accounted for 2 Yankee wins in the WS. Now those wins are tainted, throwing into question the whole legitimacy of the Yankees 2000 title. </p>
<p>Lets face it, that whole Yankee team was tarnished badly by the Mitchell report. Take off your pin-striped blinders long enough to be objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Savoy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31037</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Savoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31037</guid>
		<description>Spiderpig --

Concerning Pete Rose, go back and read about his meetings with Bart Giamatti and the pledge he signed right before Commissioner Giamatti died.  Pete Rose is out of the Hall of Fame by his own hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiderpig&#8212;<br />
Concerning Pete Rose, go back and read about his meetings with Bart Giamatti and the pledge he signed right before Commissioner Giamatti died.  Pete Rose is out of the Hall of Fame by his own hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xryanx</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31036</link>
		<dc:creator>xryanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31036</guid>
		<description>You Met fans really crack me up. Did you even bother to read the Mitchell report or are you just sitting there with your 2000 National League Champions shirts on screaming &#039;WE DESERVE THE TITLE!!&#039; Justice used AFTER the 2000 WS, Stanton used in 2003 when he WAS ON THE METS, Canseco had 1AB in the WS, Knoblauch hit .100 in the WS, Grimsley wasn&#039;t apart of the WS,  Pettitte supposedly used in 2002. I can&#039;t wait until Clemens and Pettitte&#039;s lawyers tear this apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Met fans really crack me up. Did you even bother to read the Mitchell report or are you just sitting there with your 2000 National League Champions shirts on screaming &#8216;WE DESERVE THE TITLE!!&#8217; Justice used AFTER the 2000 WS, Stanton used in 2003 when he WAS ON THE METS, Canseco had 1AB in the WS, Knoblauch hit .100 in the WS, Grimsley wasn&#8217;t apart of the WS,  Pettitte supposedly used in 2002. I can&#8217;t wait until Clemens and Pettitte&#8217;s lawyers tear this apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31035</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31035</guid>
		<description>There are over 30 players that were on the rumored list that are not mentioned in the actual report including Albert Pujols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are over 30 players that were on the rumored list that are not mentioned in the actual report including Albert Pujols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny Ayala</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31034</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny Ayala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31034</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had ESPN on in the background all day, and I must admit some concern about how Buster Olney&#039;s hair isn&#039;t holding up under the hot studio lights.  Granted, his hair looked bouncing and behaving in the early hours, but I believe the Selig press conference took the starch out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had ESPN on in the background all day, and I must admit some concern about how Buster Olney&#8217;s hair isn&#8217;t holding up under the hot studio lights.  Granted, his hair looked bouncing and behaving in the early hours, but I believe the Selig press conference took the starch out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Bones in SC</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31033</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bones in SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31033</guid>
		<description>Clemens should walk straight into the HOF.  His numbers and record ever since he college and JUCO are phenomenal.  Steriods are not the reason Roger is one of the best ever to play.  

Unlike Barry who put on tremendous mass (including his head!), Roger has basically stayed the same.  He is thicker, but it looks consistent with anyone his age.  

Has Roger picked up more velocity on his fast ball?  Or has he demonstrating overpowering stuff? NO.  Roger is very similar pitcher today than he was when he first arrived. Barry is not even close to the same player he was when he first came up, and amazingly he got better at age 37.   Hmmmm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clemens should walk straight into the HOF.  His numbers and record ever since he college and JUCO are phenomenal.  Steriods are not the reason Roger is one of the best ever to play.  </p>
<p>Unlike Barry who put on tremendous mass (including his head!), Roger has basically stayed the same.  He is thicker, but it looks consistent with anyone his age.  </p>
<p>Has Roger picked up more velocity on his fast ball?  Or has he demonstrating overpowering stuff? NO.  Roger is very similar pitcher today than he was when he first arrived. Barry is not even close to the same player he was when he first came up, and amazingly he got better at age 37.   Hmmmm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31031</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31031</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really like Roger Clemens.  Yeah sure you thought it was the ball, and you also thought you were playing dodgeball?  I think the reason a lot of these players are able to compete so far into their 40&#039;s is roids.  Plain and simple.  And please don&#039;t tell me about Satchel Paige.  He wouldn&#039;t last to the age of 42 in today&#039;s major leagues.  Baseball has gotten better, not worse, over time.  Its more difficult for 40yr olds to compete against 28yr olds now than it was 30 or 40 yrs ago.  I think Alou might be on something.  Look at his musculature.  He&#039;s 40 people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really like Roger Clemens.  Yeah sure you thought it was the ball, and you also thought you were playing dodgeball?  I think the reason a lot of these players are able to compete so far into their 40&#8217;s is roids.  Plain and simple.  And please don&#8217;t tell me about Satchel Paige.  He wouldn&#8217;t last to the age of 42 in today&#8217;s major leagues.  Baseball has gotten better, not worse, over time.  Its more difficult for 40yr olds to compete against 28yr olds now than it was 30 or 40 yrs ago.  I think Alou might be on something.  Look at his musculature.  He&#8217;s 40 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chucky</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31030</link>
		<dc:creator>chucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31030</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many guys who used steroids are in the HOF who were simply fortunate enough not to get caught?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many guys who used steroids are in the HOF who were simply fortunate enough not to get caught?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiderpig</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31029</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiderpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31029</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how you can keep anybody out of the HOF because playersw on both sides were doing it and nobody was stopping them until recently. That&#039;s like saying somebody with not-so-good numbers should get in because you think he was clean during this period, and nobody&#039;s voting for that player. I say just take it as part of the game and move on. I still don&#039;t see why Pete Rose can&#039;t get in based on his playing career, but that&#039;s of course an entirely different issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how you can keep anybody out of the HOF because playersw on both sides were doing it and nobody was stopping them until recently. That&#8217;s like saying somebody with not-so-good numbers should get in because you think he was clean during this period, and nobody&#8217;s voting for that player. I say just take it as part of the game and move on. I still don&#8217;t see why Pete Rose can&#8217;t get in based on his playing career, but that&#8217;s of course an entirely different issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31028</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31028</guid>
		<description>Mitchell gave Clemens the opportunity to meet with him, view the evidence, and deny it all. Clemens could have done so, accompanied by an attorney. But he declined to do so.  He was too busy this summer robbing the Yankees of $18 million for 6 measly wins. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitchell gave Clemens the opportunity to meet with him, view the evidence, and deny it all. Clemens could have done so, accompanied by an attorney. But he declined to do so.  He was too busy this summer robbing the Yankees of $18 million for 6 measly wins. LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31027</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31027</guid>
		<description>And of course there&#039;s no failed drug test ... because they didn&#039;t test for it during that period. That doesn&#039;t mean there&#039;s no evidence Clemens cheated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course there&#8217;s no failed drug test &#8230; because they didn&#8217;t test for it during that period. That doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s no evidence Clemens cheated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31026</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31026</guid>
		<description>&quot;He said&quot; is evidence in a court of law. If Clemens thinks he was unfairly tarnished, then let him put his money where his big fat mouth is. Sue McNamee. Sue Mitchell. C&#039;mon Roger, don&#039;t chicken out again. 

I bet he won&#039;t dare. Because he knows he&#039;s guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He said&#8221; is evidence in a court of law. If Clemens thinks he was unfairly tarnished, then let him put his money where his big fat mouth is. Sue McNamee. Sue Mitchell. C&#8217;mon Roger, don&#8217;t chicken out again. </p>
<p>I bet he won&#8217;t dare. Because he knows he&#8217;s guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/comment-page-1/#comment-31025</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/12/13/what-about-clemens/#comment-31025</guid>
		<description>Should read: &quot;They think Mitchell had it in for them...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should read: &#8220;They think Mitchell had it in for them&#8230;&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
