<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garland traded to Angels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/</link>
	<description>All about the Mets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:08:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29861</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29861</guid>
		<description>My read on Eckstein is the $$ and he was not thrilled to come here and change positions.

Omar in the past seems to make a pitch read the other side and move on if he thinks it will drag on.

That is what I think happened here.  

So Castillo returns. I am ok with that.

I still think we should get Paulie back. I was watching SNY and they seem to agree.

I think Gotay is gone in a trade..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My read on Eckstein is the $$ and he was not thrilled to come here and change positions.</p>
<p>Omar in the past seems to make a pitch read the other side and move on if he thinks it will drag on.</p>
<p>That is what I think happened here.  </p>
<p>So Castillo returns. I am ok with that.</p>
<p>I still think we should get Paulie back. I was watching SNY and they seem to agree.</p>
<p>I think Gotay is gone in a trade..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29837</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29837</guid>
		<description>Scott, I did not say that the wilpons don&#039;t get money from SNY.Of course they get money from SNY. They are a majority owner in SNY. 

What I said is that they treat SNY as a separate business and will not add payroll based upon revenues from SNY.

As for the lux tax, they have had plenty of chances to get a guy that would have put them over that level. Just a week ago they could have made a bid on Arod. They could have figured out a way to put him on 1b if they wanted to get him.

Someone also said that finding talent is a crapshoot. The Mets must have never had the dice in their hands, b/c for 46 yrs we have never had an MVP, only 1 cy young winner, and I think only a couple ROY and only 2 WS winners. Even by chance you would think in 46 yrs the Mets would have more than that to show.

I&#039;d like to believe that the Braves and Yanks and now the sox did it through some good evaluation and not just by chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I did not say that the wilpons don&#8217;t get money from SNY.Of course they get money from SNY. They are a majority owner in SNY. </p>
<p>What I said is that they treat SNY as a separate business and will not add payroll based upon revenues from SNY.</p>
<p>As for the lux tax, they have had plenty of chances to get a guy that would have put them over that level. Just a week ago they could have made a bid on Arod. They could have figured out a way to put him on 1b if they wanted to get him.</p>
<p>Someone also said that finding talent is a crapshoot. The Mets must have never had the dice in their hands, b/c for 46 yrs we have never had an MVP, only 1 cy young winner, and I think only a couple ROY and only 2 WS winners. Even by chance you would think in 46 yrs the Mets would have more than that to show.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to believe that the Braves and Yanks and now the sox did it through some good evaluation and not just by chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29828</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been readng this debate and at first I had the opinion that Omar was a great GM.  But I&#039;ve changed my mind reading these positions.  Maybe its Omar, maybe its the Wilpons, but we just don&#039;t seem willing to go the Extra Mile to be an elite club.

We are the second team in the City and we act like the second team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been readng this debate and at first I had the opinion that Omar was a great GM.  But I&#8217;ve changed my mind reading these positions.  Maybe its Omar, maybe its the Wilpons, but we just don&#8217;t seem willing to go the Extra Mile to be an elite club.</p>
<p>We are the second team in the City and we act like the second team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29827</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29827</guid>
		<description>Spider: The reason I say we want to be a bargain basement team is because the Mets seem to take great pleasure in Endy, Valentin Castro etc.  And since they signed Pedro/Beltran they seem to think that top players should come begging to join he fun.  Every guy is now too much and every trade is too much.  The Red Sox have a need they pull the trigger.  No ifs and or buts.  Last year I thought Omar misread the market thereby losing Bradford and findng no starter.  This year we hear he picked Castillo because he was cheaper than Eckstein, he&#039;s looking for a bargain at the plate.  Well when is he going to go back to the original philosphy of getting the best. 
If the Twins weren&#039;t just dumping Castillo last year he wouldn&#039;t have made that move either.  

And by the way the cheapskate Marlins have 2 WS flags in a decade, two more than we have in the last 2 decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spider: The reason I say we want to be a bargain basement team is because the Mets seem to take great pleasure in Endy, Valentin Castro etc.  And since they signed Pedro/Beltran they seem to think that top players should come begging to join he fun.  Every guy is now too much and every trade is too much.  The Red Sox have a need they pull the trigger.  No ifs and or buts.  Last year I thought Omar misread the market thereby losing Bradford and findng no starter.  This year we hear he picked Castillo because he was cheaper than Eckstein, he&#8217;s looking for a bargain at the plate.  Well when is he going to go back to the original philosphy of getting the best. <br />
If the Twins weren&#8217;t just dumping Castillo last year he wouldn&#8217;t have made that move either.  </p>
<p>And by the way the cheapskate Marlins have 2 WS flags in a decade, two more than we have in the last 2 decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29826</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29826</guid>
		<description>Sloppy,

Perhaps you are right about the reasons we do not go after the talent we need.

I hope you are wrong.

I hope that it was a considered decision last year where the breaks didn&#039;t go our way and now that the fans are upset and the organization does not seem to be able to offer major leaague talent that is ready now they will change gears and trade the 2 birds in the bush for one in the hand.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppy,</p>
<p>Perhaps you are right about the reasons we do not go after the talent we need.</p>
<p>I hope you are wrong.</p>
<p>I hope that it was a considered decision last year where the breaks didn&#8217;t go our way and now that the fans are upset and the organization does not seem to be able to offer major leaague talent that is ready now they will change gears and trade the 2 birds in the bush for one in the hand.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott from Pelham</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29825</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott from Pelham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29825</guid>
		<description>scoopcoop:  to say no SNY money comes to the Mets is just plain wrong.  SNY has to show that it is paying a fee to the Mets to show the games ( and it has to be a legit amount ) or 
MLB would be after the Mets for hiding money from revenue sharing.  As far as the luxury tax that is not really a problem because if the Mets went over the luxury tax they could deduct against construction expenses for CitiField.
I think the Mets would go over the luxury tax for the right players.  Just the right players are not available in the FA market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scoopcoop:  to say no SNY money comes to the Mets is just plain wrong.  SNY has to show that it is paying a fee to the Mets to show the games ( and it has to be a legit amount ) or <br />
MLB would be after the Mets for hiding money from revenue sharing.  As far as the luxury tax that is not really a problem because if the Mets went over the luxury tax they could deduct against construction expenses for CitiField.<br />
I think the Mets would go over the luxury tax for the right players.  Just the right players are not available in the FA market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiderpig</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29824</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiderpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29824</guid>
		<description>Sloppy - I wouldn&#039;t say the Mets are trying to field a &quot;bargain basement team&quot; when they are spending upwards of $100 million per season. You must be thinking of the Marlins. But your point still gets across that once they get close to their self-imposed cap or the luxury tax, they start thinking cheap rather than talented. The real issue is why they are so close to the luxury tax with a team that is bad enough to choke on the division title. Omar has to look closer to spend money in the right places to keep enough open for the top talent later. Giving big money to someone who will fill our fourth spot in the rotation would not be smart rather than waiting to fill the second spot. Hopefully, we can get someone who&#039;s already in the organization to fill the fourth spot, or sign someone worth #4 money, but then we can&#039;t complain when he&#039;s average.

I hope that made sense, because it seems like I rambled a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppy &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t say the Mets are trying to field a &#8220;bargain basement team&#8221; when they are spending upwards of $100 million per season. You must be thinking of the Marlins. But your point still gets across that once they get close to their self-imposed cap or the luxury tax, they start thinking cheap rather than talented. The real issue is why they are so close to the luxury tax with a team that is bad enough to choke on the division title. Omar has to look closer to spend money in the right places to keep enough open for the top talent later. Giving big money to someone who will fill our fourth spot in the rotation would not be smart rather than waiting to fill the second spot. Hopefully, we can get someone who&#8217;s already in the organization to fill the fourth spot, or sign someone worth #4 money, but then we can&#8217;t complain when he&#8217;s average.</p>
<p>I hope that made sense, because it seems like I rambled a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott from Pelham</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29823</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott from Pelham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29823</guid>
		<description>and a happy turkey day to all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and a happy turkey day to all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott from Pelham</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29822</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott from Pelham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29822</guid>
		<description>I hear all this talk about how Omar has failed to find a # 1 guy.  The draft is a crapshoot.  Have you all forget the Santana was a Rule 5 pick up by the Twins.  They let him take time and he developed into the ace he is.  The truth is they got lucky.  Remember this is also the same organization that non-tendered David Ortiz after they could not find anybody 
( including Omar ) who wanted him in a trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear all this talk about how Omar has failed to find a # 1 guy.  The draft is a crapshoot.  Have you all forget the Santana was a Rule 5 pick up by the Twins.  They let him take time and he developed into the ace he is.  The truth is they got lucky.  Remember this is also the same organization that non-tendered David Ortiz after they could not find anybody <br />
( including Omar ) who wanted him in a trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29820</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29820</guid>
		<description>Obviously Mulvey is an Omar pick, but the organization appears to much higher on Pelfrey than Mulvey.

The supposed experts, however, believe pelfrey is only a reliever; not a front of rotation guy, while Mulvey is projected to be a #3-4 SP. That is not a good sign for Omar. of course the expers believe F Martinez is going to be great and he is an Omar guy too. Time will tell if Omar can pick young talent.

And since this FO/owners don&#039;t want to spend giant sums of money they eed to develop some from w/in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Mulvey is an Omar pick, but the organization appears to much higher on Pelfrey than Mulvey.</p>
<p>The supposed experts, however, believe pelfrey is only a reliever; not a front of rotation guy, while Mulvey is projected to be a #3-4 SP. That is not a good sign for Omar. of course the expers believe F Martinez is going to be great and he is an Omar guy too. Time will tell if Omar can pick young talent.</p>
<p>And since this FO/owners don&#8217;t want to spend giant sums of money they eed to develop some from w/in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave in Spain</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave in Spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29816</guid>
		<description>scoopcoop- Mulvey is a more recent pick than Pelfrey, so heÃ‚Â´s an Omar guy too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scoopcoop- Mulvey is a more recent pick than Pelfrey, so heÃ‚Â´s an Omar guy too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29815</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29815</guid>
		<description>If we do get a #1 guy I hope they don&#039;t trade this Mulvey guy. Alot of baseball people are saying he is better (in the sense he has command of his pitches and is not afraid to throw them) than Pelfrey. Of course they could be saying that b/c pelf has been exposed to MLB and Mulvey has not.

Here is an example of where you wonder if Omar can pick the right guys. Pelfrey was his pick and from I&#039;ve seen he needs more seasoning to command his off speed stuff and someone needs to get it into his head that he needs to not be afraid to throw strikes. Hard to say if he will overcome these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we do get a #1 guy I hope they don&#8217;t trade this Mulvey guy. Alot of baseball people are saying he is better (in the sense he has command of his pitches and is not afraid to throw them) than Pelfrey. Of course they could be saying that b/c pelf has been exposed to MLB and Mulvey has not.</p>
<p>Here is an example of where you wonder if Omar can pick the right guys. Pelfrey was his pick and from I&#8217;ve seen he needs more seasoning to command his off speed stuff and someone needs to get it into his head that he needs to not be afraid to throw strikes. Hard to say if he will overcome these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29814</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29814</guid>
		<description>dave:
you are absolutrly right  AND  
If you were the GM and owner we&#039;d have a # 1 starter.  You&#039;re not.  We ain&#039;t getting one.  Listen to Scoop and that&#039;s why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dave:<br />
you are absolutrly right  AND  <br />
If you were the GM and owner we&#8217;d have a # 1 starter.  You&#8217;re not.  We ain&#8217;t getting one.  Listen to Scoop and that&#8217;s why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29812</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29812</guid>
		<description>I think the most important issue is #5.

If we get a #1 type pitcher ( or even one that is close ) what that does besides solidifying the rotation generating stability and the sense/hope that if you lose a couple of games that we will win this one ( most recently Pedro was that guy before he got hurt ); it also gives the pen a rest. As we saw last year the pen got tired. I forget the numbers but at one time in the early part of the season our pen was top 3 in the league or majors in terms of era, effectiveness. My take on that is that besides players playing well and all they were fresh. It also helped that Smith was on fire. 

In the second half many of our starters fell off a cliff. El Duque had his usual stint on the DL, Maine - after an MVP start - had major issues , could not win games, could not last 5 etc. Ollie also had his issues for a month or so ( I know I had both on my fantasy squad and took a mjor hit in many catg - wins/innings/K/era ). Not to beat the dead horse but at the end of the day our own Tommy G was the most consistant throughout the whole season. Yes he had issues leading up to 300, but you have to expect that. Once the proverbial monkey was off his back he went back to his usual effective self.

My point is in this long winded reply is that if we get a real stud pitcher it solves 2 things: 

1) Solidifies rotation creating stability/wins/etc.
2) Saves the pen - They actually get a rest during the season.

If you get one guy like that and Maine and Ollie repeat last year what you get is at least for a month or so you have 60% of the games where your pen pitches 1 or 2 innings. That means when you may need them in the dog days of summer or in the stretch run they ain&#039;t dead. 

And you don&#039;t even have to change ( which we may not do much of because of the contracts ).

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the most important issue is #5.</p>
<p>If we get a #1 type pitcher ( or even one that is close ) what that does besides solidifying the rotation generating stability and the sense/hope that if you lose a couple of games that we will win this one ( most recently Pedro was that guy before he got hurt ); it also gives the pen a rest. As we saw last year the pen got tired. I forget the numbers but at one time in the early part of the season our pen was top 3 in the league or majors in terms of era, effectiveness. My take on that is that besides players playing well and all they were fresh. It also helped that Smith was on fire. </p>
<p>In the second half many of our starters fell off a cliff. El Duque had his usual stint on the DL, Maine &#8211; after an MVP start &#8211; had major issues , could not win games, could not last 5 etc. Ollie also had his issues for a month or so ( I know I had both on my fantasy squad and took a mjor hit in many catg &#8211; wins/innings/K/era ). Not to beat the dead horse but at the end of the day our own Tommy G was the most consistant throughout the whole season. Yes he had issues leading up to 300, but you have to expect that. Once the proverbial monkey was off his back he went back to his usual effective self.</p>
<p>My point is in this long winded reply is that if we get a real stud pitcher it solves 2 things: </p>
<p>1) Solidifies rotation creating stability/wins/etc.<br />
2) Saves the pen &#8211; They actually get a rest during the season.</p>
<p>If you get one guy like that and Maine and Ollie repeat last year what you get is at least for a month or so you have 60% of the games where your pen pitches 1 or 2 innings. That means when you may need them in the dog days of summer or in the stretch run they ain&#8217;t dead. </p>
<p>And you don&#8217;t even have to change ( which we may not do much of because of the contracts ).</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29811</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29811</guid>
		<description>slop

The money issue I have w/the wilpons is that they keep the parts of the baseball operation separate from one another and won&#039;t spend profits from say SNY on the team payroll. it would be interesting to know if other sources of money hat will be coming in like the 20MM for naming rights (CitiField) or the 30MM for MLB.com are considered &quot;baseball operations&quot;.

Only money from the true baseball operation (tickets, concessions, parking) goes to the team. This is different from the yanks who use money from YES to bolster the team payroll. At least this is how it has been reported. 

Plus, it has also been reported that the wilpons won&#039;t go over the lux tax threshold b/c selig hates that teams (yanks, sox) spend so much (hence the tax in the first place) and they don&#039;t want to ruffle the commisioner.

Of course it is their money and their business and they chose how to run it. As a fan it is frustrating to know that there could be more spent on the team if they wanted to do it.

And when you are spending more than any other team in the NL, you don&#039;t have much of a leg to stand on to make complaints.

That is why everytime someone ssys sign Liily or a Silva I get concerned it might happen and if it does and the guy stinks, we will be stuck watching him for several yrs b/c the wilpons don&#039;t ever eat salary. The ex for far this yr is Castillo.

But on the other hand they won&#039;t, in general, go after the top talent b/c it costs too much. It&#039;s not a recipe that lends itself to long term consistent winning unless you develop w/in. That is where Omar concerns me the most-can he develop talent w/in-the jury is still out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slop</p>
<p>The money issue I have w/the wilpons is that they keep the parts of the baseball operation separate from one another and won&#8217;t spend profits from say SNY on the team payroll. it would be interesting to know if other sources of money hat will be coming in like the 20MM for naming rights (CitiField) or the 30MM for MLB.com are considered &#8220;baseball operations&#8221;.</p>
<p>Only money from the true baseball operation (tickets, concessions, parking) goes to the team. This is different from the yanks who use money from YES to bolster the team payroll. At least this is how it has been reported. </p>
<p>Plus, it has also been reported that the wilpons won&#8217;t go over the lux tax threshold b/c selig hates that teams (yanks, sox) spend so much (hence the tax in the first place) and they don&#8217;t want to ruffle the commisioner.</p>
<p>Of course it is their money and their business and they chose how to run it. As a fan it is frustrating to know that there could be more spent on the team if they wanted to do it.</p>
<p>And when you are spending more than any other team in the NL, you don&#8217;t have much of a leg to stand on to make complaints.</p>
<p>That is why everytime someone ssys sign Liily or a Silva I get concerned it might happen and if it does and the guy stinks, we will be stuck watching him for several yrs b/c the wilpons don&#8217;t ever eat salary. The ex for far this yr is Castillo.</p>
<p>But on the other hand they won&#8217;t, in general, go after the top talent b/c it costs too much. It&#8217;s not a recipe that lends itself to long term consistent winning unless you develop w/in. That is where Omar concerns me the most-can he develop talent w/in-the jury is still out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29810</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29810</guid>
		<description>dave.  Let&#039;s go point by point.  
1.Giant changes vs Met changes.  Giant coach job on line.  Met manager job SHOULD be on line.
2.  Giant Def coordinator made major scheme changes.  Coaches are more important in football, I&#039;ll give you that, but point is Giants changed coaches on both sides and had a plan to replace Tiki.  Jacobs plu decent subs and throw the ball to everyone.  Mets seem to have no plan.  Just panic moves.
3.  Willie emphasied hustle.  Well, I guess he forgot about that in 207.  He even suppressed the fire in the kids.
4.  We don&#039;t have the horses.  Well, its not my fault or your fault.  Its the GMs fault.  He dumped all the young releievers for nobody and signed 3 bums to &quot;help&quot;.  
5.  We need a number 1.  Why? Our pen will suck without major overhaul, which isn&#039;t even being mentioned.  and Mets are too cheap with $$ or too afraid to give up prospects to pull the trigger.  They wouldn&#039;t pull trigger to win the division last Summer, what makes anyone think they&#039;ll pull triggr IF, and that&#039;s a big if someone wants to lose an ace.   You say our kid pitchers won&#039;t help.  Then why would someone else want them?  No lgic to that.  Don&#039;t say they want to dump salary.  Who was last ace traded?  Beckett??  3 years ago.  They are all in profit now.  So who is dumping salary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dave.  Let&#8217;s go point by point.  <br />
1.Giant changes vs Met changes.  Giant coach job on line.  Met manager job SHOULD be on line.<br />
2.  Giant Def coordinator made major scheme changes.  Coaches are more important in football, I&#8217;ll give you that, but point is Giants changed coaches on both sides and had a plan to replace Tiki.  Jacobs plu decent subs and throw the ball to everyone.  Mets seem to have no plan.  Just panic moves.<br />
3.  Willie emphasied hustle.  Well, I guess he forgot about that in 207.  He even suppressed the fire in the kids.<br />
4.  We don&#8217;t have the horses.  Well, its not my fault or your fault.  Its the GMs fault.  He dumped all the young releievers for nobody and signed 3 bums to &#8220;help&#8221;.  <br />
5.  We need a number 1.  Why? Our pen will suck without major overhaul, which isn&#8217;t even being mentioned.  and Mets are too cheap with $$ or too afraid to give up prospects to pull the trigger.  They wouldn&#8217;t pull trigger to win the division last Summer, what makes anyone think they&#8217;ll pull triggr IF, and that&#8217;s a big if someone wants to lose an ace.   You say our kid pitchers won&#8217;t help.  Then why would someone else want them?  No lgic to that.  Don&#8217;t say they want to dump salary.  Who was last ace traded?  Beckett??  3 years ago.  They are all in profit now.  So who is dumping salary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29809</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29809</guid>
		<description>Sloppy

Re: Gints

The coaches job is on the line.

They have a new defensive coordinator who brought in a new scheme. They replaced the old cb&#039;s with one who was drafted this year. A no name RB has helped them win and the incumbant who replaced Tiki is doing well.

The QB seems to be playing better so far.

But mostly I think it is the defensive scheme and the coordinator.

I don&#039;t think it translates to baseball well.

Willie came in a few years ago and emphasized defense and fundamentals. Hustle all that stuff he did as a player. 

The team as a whole plays sound baseball. Some players have issues, but the team in the spring works on the details and seems prepared.

The issue as I see it with the Mets is our pitching is weak. We do not have the horses. Strategy can&#039;t help here. They worked a plan and in the last month the horses died of exhaustion.

That is why I want a good pitcher who can go 7+ every 5th day. Hopefully Maine will be more consistant this year and not get tired again. He only pitched 1/2 a season last year.

Ollie has his annual issues with focus and control and staying within himself. If Pedro can come back this year and pitch a whole season even only going 6+ that would help, but we need a #1 this off season. 

Pelfrey/Humber/Mulvey won&#039;t help with that this year. The only thing they can do is put pressure on the pen. We do that already with all of our starting pitching.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sloppy</p>
<p>Re: Gints</p>
<p>The coaches job is on the line.</p>
<p>They have a new defensive coordinator who brought in a new scheme. They replaced the old cb&#8217;s with one who was drafted this year. A no name RB has helped them win and the incumbant who replaced Tiki is doing well.</p>
<p>The QB seems to be playing better so far.</p>
<p>But mostly I think it is the defensive scheme and the coordinator.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it translates to baseball well.</p>
<p>Willie came in a few years ago and emphasized defense and fundamentals. Hustle all that stuff he did as a player. </p>
<p>The team as a whole plays sound baseball. Some players have issues, but the team in the spring works on the details and seems prepared.</p>
<p>The issue as I see it with the Mets is our pitching is weak. We do not have the horses. Strategy can&#8217;t help here. They worked a plan and in the last month the horses died of exhaustion.</p>
<p>That is why I want a good pitcher who can go 7+ every 5th day. Hopefully Maine will be more consistant this year and not get tired again. He only pitched 1/2 a season last year.</p>
<p>Ollie has his annual issues with focus and control and staying within himself. If Pedro can come back this year and pitch a whole season even only going 6+ that would help, but we need a #1 this off season. </p>
<p>Pelfrey/Humber/Mulvey won&#8217;t help with that this year. The only thing they can do is put pressure on the pen. We do that already with all of our starting pitching.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29804</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29804</guid>
		<description>PS:  The debate here has become really great.  Discussions without any personal attacks.  This is blogosphere at its best.   So everybody enjoy Thanksgiving and I hope you all got it right about what Omar&#039;s gonna do and I got it wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS:  The debate here has become really great.  Discussions without any personal attacks.  This is blogosphere at its best.   So everybody enjoy Thanksgiving and I hope you all got it right about what Omar&#8217;s gonna do and I got it wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloppy</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29803</link>
		<dc:creator>sloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29803</guid>
		<description>Scoop;

Assuming you are correct Scoop, then the question is do the owners want to field the best team possible or not.  It seems they want to field the bargain basement team, in which case we as fans should return Shea to its half empty state.  When the turnstiles don&#039;t click the Wilpons want the best unril....And if they don&#039;t want the best the GM should leave otherwise I have to blame him.....   
More importantly the GMen are in pretty good shape for the playoffs.  They tried last year to show the Mets how to choke  and the Mets perfected the art.  Hopefully the GMEN won&#039;t try it again.  Anybody gonna be in Giant Stadium Sunday?  But notice the Giants made some changes.  New strategies on O and D.  Using all the defensive ends at the same time, to try to hide their hideous bullpen, I mean secondary, dealing with their strengths, much more varied passing set ups.   Anybody notice that from the Mets yet.  We&#039;ll see if they follow the Giants again or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scoop;</p>
<p>Assuming you are correct Scoop, then the question is do the owners want to field the best team possible or not.  It seems they want to field the bargain basement team, in which case we as fans should return Shea to its half empty state.  When the turnstiles don&#8217;t click the Wilpons want the best unril&#8230;.And if they don&#8217;t want the best the GM should leave otherwise I have to blame him&#8230;..   <br />
More importantly the GMen are in pretty good shape for the playoffs.  They tried last year to show the Mets how to choke  and the Mets perfected the art.  Hopefully the GMEN won&#8217;t try it again.  Anybody gonna be in Giant Stadium Sunday?  But notice the Giants made some changes.  New strategies on O and D.  Using all the defensive ends at the same time, to try to hide their hideous bullpen, I mean secondary, dealing with their strengths, much more varied passing set ups.   Anybody notice that from the Mets yet.  We&#8217;ll see if they follow the Giants again or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoopcoop</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-29802</link>
		<dc:creator>scoopcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/garland-traded-to-angels/#comment-29802</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t fill the bottom of the rotation w/a guy who wants 5/60 b/c you won&#039;t be able to then get the top of the rotation guy. The mets have a budget. I don&#039;t agree w/it but they won&#039;t go over a payroll that will force the lux tax.

slop, is the govt afiard to spend your money? If you have kids are the afraid to spend your money? Omar is not afraid to spend the wilpons money. He doesn&#039;t own the team. He makes recommedations and the wilpons say yes or no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t fill the bottom of the rotation w/a guy who wants 5/60 b/c you won&#8217;t be able to then get the top of the rotation guy. The mets have a budget. I don&#8217;t agree w/it but they won&#8217;t go over a payroll that will force the lux tax.</p>
<p>slop, is the govt afiard to spend your money? If you have kids are the afraid to spend your money? Omar is not afraid to spend the wilpons money. He doesn&#8217;t own the team. He makes recommedations and the wilpons say yes or no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
