Comments on: March 24: Post-Game: Why Park wasn’t told http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/24/march-24-post-game-why-park-wasnt-told/ All about the Mets Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:08:38 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John Delcos http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/24/march-24-post-game-why-park-wasnt-told/comment-page-1/#comment-7038 John Delcos Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:56:00 +0000 http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/24/march-24-post-game-why-park-wasnt-told/#comment-7038 To NYM (RE: Four starters) This doesn't change the fact there are three off days the first two weeks of the season, which means the fifth starter won't be pitching on a regular basis. It's not unrealistic to think Pelfrey could be slotted in fourth and Oliver Perez bumped to fifth and be the odd-man out at the start. To NYM (RE: Four starters)

This doesn’t change the fact there are three off days the first two weeks of the season, which means the fifth starter won’t be pitching on a regular basis. It’s not unrealistic to think Pelfrey could be slotted in fourth and Oliver Perez bumped to fifth and be the odd-man out at the start.

]]> By: NYM http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/24/march-24-post-game-why-park-wasnt-told/comment-page-1/#comment-7020 NYM Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:34:27 +0000 http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/24/march-24-post-game-why-park-wasnt-told/#comment-7020 john does that have any affect on starting the season with 4 starters??? john does that have any affect on starting the season with 4 starters???

]]>