<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: March 09: Good morning: Hernandez/Pelfrey good</title>
	<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/</link>
	<description>All about the Mets</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>We will find out in a couple of weeks.

Perez may pitch himself into a bullpen role</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will find out in a couple of weeks.</p>
<p>Perez may pitch himself into a bullpen role</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Delcos</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>John Delcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>To Nate (RE: Pelfrey v. Perez)

Perez is ahead of Pelfrey in the rotation because he's left handed and had success on the major league level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Nate (RE: Pelfrey v. Perez)</p>
<p>Perez is ahead of Pelfrey in the rotation because he's left handed and had success on the major league level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6232</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6232</guid>
		<description>I am all for not rushing Pelfrey to the bigs, but there seems to be a double standard emerging between him and Oliver Perez. Willie/ Peterson are always saying that Pelfrey has to be all there - mentally and physically - before they are going to bring him into a big league situation. But what about O.P. Is he all there? He stepped up in the playoffs for us, but other than that he has been mediocre. But he seems nearly guaranteed a spot over Pelfrey and Vargas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for not rushing Pelfrey to the bigs, but there seems to be a double standard emerging between him and Oliver Perez. Willie/ Peterson are always saying that Pelfrey has to be all there &#8211; mentally and physically &#8211; before they are going to bring him into a big league situation. But what about O.P. Is he all there? He stepped up in the playoffs for us, but other than that he has been mediocre. But he seems nearly guaranteed a spot over Pelfrey and Vargas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mets.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/09/march-09-good-morning-hernandezpelfrey-good/#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a yes vote to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a yes vote to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
